Bilbliometric Analysis of Euthanasia in the Perspective of Medical Ethics

Main Article Content

Elsa Yuniarti
Jessi Rizkanauli Simangunsong
Aditiya Ramadhani
Nabila Azzahra

Abstract

Background: Euthanasia has emerged as a critical topic of debate in society, encompassing both public discourse and private considerations within medical, legal, and ethical domains. The concept, which involves death with or without physician assistance, has gained significant attention due to its complex implications for human rights, medical ethics, and professional practice. The development of euthanasia policies in various countries has raised new challenges related to conscientious objection and medical practice adjustments.


Methods: This study employed a bibliometric analysis approach using Scopus as the primary data source. The search query focused on "euthanasia in medical ethics perspective" for publications from 2016 to 2024. Data cleaning and transformation were conducted using OpenRefine, while VOSviewer software (version 1.6.6) was utilized for data analysis and visualization, generating network, overlay, and density visualizations to identify publication trends across various metrics.


Results: The analysis revealed significant fluctuations in euthanasia-related publications from 1976 to 2024, with notable peaks in 1992, 1996, and 2000. The United States emerged as the leading country in publications, followed by significant contributions from the Netherlands and Belgium. Medical disciplines dominated the subject areas (45.2%), followed by nursing (9.7%) and social sciences (5.9%). The research identified three main clusters in global euthanasia research: one focusing on humanitarian and ethical aspects led by the United States, another centered on legalization progress led by Belgium and the Netherlands, and a third cluster examining death and legal aspects.


Conclusion: Euthanasia research shows diverse disciplinary contributions, with medical perspectives dominating but requiring integration with nursing and psychological insights for comprehensive policy development that respects patient values.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Yuniarti E, Jessi Rizkanauli Simangunsong, Aditiya Ramadhani, Nabila Azzahra. Bilbliometric Analysis of Euthanasia in the Perspective of Medical Ethics. Front. Healthc. Res. [Internet]. 2025 Feb. 25 [cited 2025 May 20];2(1):67-76. Available from: https://frontiersonhealthcare.org/index.php/id/article/view/72
Section
Article

How to Cite

1.
Yuniarti E, Jessi Rizkanauli Simangunsong, Aditiya Ramadhani, Nabila Azzahra. Bilbliometric Analysis of Euthanasia in the Perspective of Medical Ethics. Front. Healthc. Res. [Internet]. 2025 Feb. 25 [cited 2025 May 20];2(1):67-76. Available from: https://frontiersonhealthcare.org/index.php/id/article/view/72

References

Heide JA, Onwuteaka-Philipsen D, van der Delden JJ. Two decades of research on euthanasia from the Netherlands: What have we learnt and what questions remain? Bioeth Inq. 2009;6:271–83.

Frunză M, Frunză S. Institutional aspects of the ethical debate on euthanasia: A communicational perspective. J Study Relig Ideol. 2013;12(34):19–36.

Krisnalita LY. Euthanasia in Indonesian criminal law and medical ethics code. Binamulia Hukum. 2022;10:171–86.

Francis LP. Death, dying and the ending of life. Volumes I and II. Routledge; 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315258447

Lamb C, Pesut B. Conscience and conscientious objection in nursing: A personalist bioethics approach. Nurs Ethics. 2021;28(7–8):1319–28.

Isnawan F. A philosophical study of the pros and cons of the prohibition of euthanasia. Yogyakarta: Islamic University of Indonesia; 2015.

Flora HS. Euthanasia in Indonesian criminal law and health law. Indones J Health Law. 2022;3(1):82–96.

Maulana S, Susanto PS. Euthanasia: A debate. J Appl Ethics. 2024;6(2):14–25.

Annadurai K. Euthanasia: Right to die with dignity. J Family Med Prim Care. 2014;3(4):477–8.

Wahidin, Maghfirah, Johari. Al-Qur'an arguments in responding to the issue of euthanasia. J Ushuluddin. 2022;30(1):124–36.

Arta IG, Handoko. Euthanasia in the epos Wiracarita Rāmāyana as a path of liberation. Dharma Duta J Hindu Relig Inf. 2021;5(3):50–61.

Fahmi N. Euthanasia in the perspective of Islamic law. J Islam Stud. 2020;8(2):253–431.

Nugraha X, Adiguno S, Yulfa S, Lathifah Y. Analysis of the potential legalization of euthanasia in Indonesia: A discourse between the right to life and the right to make choices. Univ Bengkulu Law J. 2021;6(1):39–59.

Rodríguez-Prat A, Balaguer A, Booth A, Monforte-Royo C. Understanding patients' experiences of the wish to hasten death: an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-ethnography. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e016659.

Suryadi T, Kulsum. Ethical and legal aspects of euthanasia. Syiah Kuala Med J. 2018;18(2):176–81.

Mondragón JD, Salame-Khouri L, Kraus-Weisman AS, Deyn PP. Bioethical implications of end-of-life decision-making in patients with dementia: A tale of two societies. Springer. 2020;49–67.

Reza MA, Dienillah FR. Current issues of euthanasia between the right to life and the right to make choices: A systematic literature review. Quantum Juris J Mod Law. 2024;6(1):158–82.

Rompegading AM, Putra BP. Euthanasia: Medical, bioethical, humanities and professionalism review. Ecosyst Sci J. 2023;12(2):120–34.

Dyer O, White C, García Rada A. Assisted dying: law and practice around the world. BMJ. 2015;351:h4481.

Norberg A. Ethical dilemmas concerning euthanasia in dementia care: A qualitative study. Nurs Ethics. 2020;27(1):107–19.

Nindrea RD, Sari NP, Lazuardi L, Aryandono T. Validation: The Use of Google Trends as an Alternative Data Source for COVID-19 Surveillance in Indonesia. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2020;32(6-7):368-369.